June Primary Election: What's On the Ballot?

Patch is your source for local election results today.

Today, Californians for the first time will vote in an open primary. That means the top two vote-getters in a race will move on to the November general election, whether they are from the same party or not.

In addition, this will be the first election with the new congressional, state Senate and state Assembly districts approved last fall by the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, which officially take effect in January. You can look at the new districts at this website.

While there are Congressional and Assembly district races underway today, today's election will also determine the fate of the much debated parcel tax.

Polls open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m., though some results may not become official until later in the week.

If you aren't sure where to go to vote, don't worry, you can locate that easily on the Alameda County Registrar of Voter's My Voter Profile page or at SmartVoter.org, the latter of which is a bit easier to navigate. You can find a number of resources on both sites.

Here's a breakdown of our local elections. Stay tuned to Union City Patch tonight for live coverage of the following races:

Local Measures

Measure H

Measure H is a New Haven Unified School District parcel tax measure that aims to “support high-quality local elementary, middle and high school education, to prepare students for college and careers with outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science, with highly qualified teachers and classified staff,” according to the ballot statement.

If passed, property owners would be taxed $180 per parcel for a period of four years, beginning July 1, 2012 and ending June 30, 2016. The measure is expected to raise $3 million for the school district each year, according to the ballot statement.

The measure also includes an optional exemption for senior citizens and persons with disabilities. Residents 65 or older and those with disabilities who wish to be exempt must apply to the district on or before July 1 each tax year.

The measure also calls for a citizen’s oversight committee to be established to make sure the tax revenues are being spent properly.


State Assembly

20th District

This new district includes Union City, Hayward, Castro Valley, San Lorenzo, Ashland, Cherryland, Fairview, Sunol and north Fremont. 

There are five candidates on the ballot:

Sarabjit Kaur Cheema, a Democrat, is a New Haven school board member. She is also on the Union City human relations commission. She works as a transportation engineer for the state.

Mark Green, listed as an Independent, has been the mayor of Union City for the past 19 years. He is a member of the Association of Bay Area Government and the Metropolitan Transporation Commission. Green has also concurrently applied for , for which an appointment will also be made today.

Jennifer Ong is a doctor of optometry in Alameda. She is also a commissioner on Alameda County Commission on the Status of Women. She is also running as a Democrat.

Bill Quirk has been on the Hayward City Council for two terms. The registered Democrat is a former NASA scientist and a retired Livermore Lab scientist.

Luis Reynoso is a Mexico native and a naturalized U.S. citizen. He attended Chabot College and Cal State Hayward. He is now a Hayward school board member. He's the sole Republican in the local Assembly race.


15th District

This new district includes San Ramon, Livermore, Dublin, Pleasanton, Castro Valley, San Lorenzo, Union City, Hayward and part of Fremont.

There are three candidates in this election.

Democrat Congressman Pete Stark was first elected to Congress in 1972. On his website, he says he has led "the fight to protect Social Security and Medicare, enact health reform, promote peace rather than war, and standing up for working families."

Democrat Eric Swalwell is an Alameda County prosecutor who also serves on the Dublin City Council. Swalwell grew up in Dublin and graduated from Dublin High. He's offering himself as a moderate alternative to Stark. Read Patch's .

Christopher Pareja lists no party preference and no job description on the ballot. On his website, he criticizes career politicians and says he wants to build strong economy. The Hayward resident is the owner of B2B Power Exchange and LeadGenaires, companies that help businesses find new opportunities. Read Patch's .

Stay tuned to Union City Patch tonight for live election coverage.

Like Union City Patch on Facebook | Follow Union City Patch on Twitter | Get Free Union City Patch Newsletters

Edward June 05, 2012 at 05:51 PM
Get out and VOTE !
Davis June 05, 2012 at 06:18 PM
Preparation H, Two NO Votes from this Parcel
Tim June 05, 2012 at 06:20 PM
Vote NO on Preparation H !!!
TruthOverDare June 05, 2012 at 09:02 PM
93% of New Haven School Distt. budget is Salaries, Benefits and Pension. Don't believe their lies. Vote NO on Preparation H. They spent $300,000 of your money on this election. Do you trust them with more money? Don't let them waste more of your money. Vote NO on H.
Davis June 05, 2012 at 09:15 PM
I would hope that the SENIORS voted NO also, sure they get an exemption but why throw their neighbors under the bus!, Those of you Seniors in that flyer can live with their hyprocacy!,
Stewart June 05, 2012 at 10:33 PM
GOOD GRIEF! Did anyone take the time to check out the salaries? The link is on another thread. I am absolutely flabbergasted that the majority of NHUSD Employees are in the SIX DIGIT figure annually! No wonder we are broke.
carrie June 06, 2012 at 03:22 AM
You can not put a price on education.I voted yes, although I agree salaries are too high I know a no vote won't help.. A yes vote may help a parent like me whose child plays sports (for the district) and who had to shell out over $200 for that benefit...part of my child's education ..of course not but seriously in this town you have to keep these kids busy....there are too many negative influences...to those of you who voted no remember this it is a small price to pay for insurance...good schools=good property values....we need all the help we can get.
Tim June 06, 2012 at 03:25 AM
Carrie, that's great... You should be doing these things for your kids... they are YOUR kids. I'd do the same for mine, but why should I pay for YOUR kids activities? But, in case you weren't aware, Measure H funds cannot be used for these activities, only core classes, aka teacher salaries.
carrie June 06, 2012 at 03:42 AM
Tim.Yes they are my kids and that is why I pay.and for the social good of all..I.also I pay my property taxes, pay into social security, medicare and all the other social programs others are able to take advantage of....We all benifit when kids are educated...remember they will be the ones paying into our social benifits...I certaintly want a breed of educated kids who can compete in a global economic environment and not one that stays in union city and hangs out on 4 and E in Decoto.
Tim June 06, 2012 at 03:45 AM
Agreed Carrie. My issue is really more with the unfairness of the parcel tax in that i's a fixed dollar amount on all parcels regardless of property value. If it were a progressive tax based on value I would support it.
Johnny C. June 06, 2012 at 08:25 AM
Sorry to see Prop# 29 Failed ! I was hoping the extra taxation would have slow down or stop smokers on their unhealthy journey !
JOHN June 06, 2012 at 10:04 PM
If Measure H passes, I'am going to need Preparation H!
JOHN June 06, 2012 at 10:16 PM
Carrie!...are you asking for a baby sitter's tax be put on my property tax? That is what's wrong with this world today. Do property owners have a money tree in the back yard?..NO! But as soon as one grows in my back yard, I'll volunteer the $180. For now, you'll have to rock your own money tree.
JOHN June 06, 2012 at 10:32 PM
JOhnny C. I did not support Prop#29 cuz this will only start another AGENCY. A director would need to be appointed, who hires the second level of managers, who gets to determine how much personel he or she wants. Then there is the salaries and wages with more benefits, vacations, sick leave, bonuses and excessive salaries and wages like another runaway train. After a couple of years the cig taxes are low, our legislators will pass a bill that gives this AGENCY the authority to tax us more so Suits can keep up with the Jones on the golf course, yacht outings, etc. If that does not do the job the AGENCY quietly encourages everybody to smoke more. That is how I see this happening. We do not need more AGENCIES, we need to down size government.
Tim June 07, 2012 at 12:51 AM
Did 29 actually fail? I thought it was not determined yet. I voted YES on 29 because I feel that for years the tobacco companies have been concealing the truth about the dangers of smoking. I have two grandparents having died from smoking related cancers. I also am sick and tired of the disrespect by some smokers smoking at entrances to public buildings. A little courtesy, please? Finally, why else would I as a conservative support this new tax? The tobacco companies spent $50 million to campaign against this proposal, while those on the No side and a meager $3 million, biggest chunks from NYC Mayor Bloomberg and Lance Armstrong. It was also endorsed and supported my the American Cancer Society, an organization I strongly support. And, not for nothing but what about the health costs of someone who smokes their entire lift and gets sick without insurance? Why should the taxpayers get stuck paying for their bad decision. I know this money will mostly be wasted and not even spent in CA and maybe I'm naive, but just maybe it would persuade some people to finally quit smoking.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something