.
Feedback

Union City Sues State Again Over Redevelopment Funds

The state’s rejection of redevelopment dollars will impact local low-income families, seniors and the city’s in-progress transit community, the city says.

The City of Union City is suing the state due to the Department of Finance prohibiting the city from using redevelopment agency dollars to fund programs and existing obligations.

“The City is taking this necessary legal action to protect the public assets of our residents and our General Fund revenues, to continue to provide the current level of City services, to complete transit- oriented development projects, and to support social services programs,” the city said in a press release Tuesday.

Nearly 400 redevelopment agencies across the state were dissolved by Gov. Jerry Brown last February with the agencies’ collective $1.7 billion used to help close California’s budget gap.

As a pre-emptive measure in February 2011, the redevelopment agency began issuing bonds and transferred redevelopment assets over to the city in order to continue redevelopment projects, which includes the ongoing work in the transit-oriented Station District.

Redevelopment dollars also fund low-income housing, rental assistance for low-income seniors at the Tropics Mobile Home Park, employment services for disabled persons and social services for local nonprofit Centro de Servicios, an organization that plays a vital role in quelling gang violence and supporting the community, according to the City of Union City.

The Department of Finance, however, recently rejected the use of those bond and agency dollars for those services and programs, placing the financial burden on the city. The city doesn’t have the financial means to support all of the redevelopment obligations, leaving those programs at risk, city staff said.

On Tuesday, the City of Union City filed a lawsuit against the Department of Finance, the California State Controller and the Alameda Audit Controller, challenging the rejection.

According to city staff, city officials met with the Department of Finance in October and December to stress the importance of continuing the redevelopment agency’s social services and completing the transit community centered around the BART station.

While much of the city’s vision has come to light — the city unveiled its new in November — what remains is “Union City BART Phase II,” a project that would open the east side of the station to allow access to the station from both sides and create a pedestrian promenade. The project has been in the making for more than a decade with millions of dollars invested in it, according to city staff.

“The DOF arbitrarily rejected the City’s factual arguments without serious analysis.  Consequently, the City had no other alternative but to file suit challenging the DOF’s unsupported decisions,” city staff said in a press release. “By the State reaching into cities’ general funds to absorb revenues, it threatens Union City’s public assets and the ability to provide local services to residents, especially the most at-risk populations – seniors, low-income families, disabled population and youth.”

This isn’t the first time the City of Union City has sued the state over redevelopment issues.

In July 2011, the City of Union City joined the City of San Jose, the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association in a California in an unsuccessful California Supreme Court lawsuit that questioned the legality of the shutting down redevelopment agencies in the first place.

The issue has been a contentious one for city and regional leaders across the state in recent years, with many equating the state’s seizure of redevelopment dollars to robbery.

Former Union City financial officer Richard Digre said in a 2011 interview that, “It’s like someone jumping out of a bush with a gun saying, ‘Your money or your life.’”

RELATED STORIES:

  • Governor's Budget Would Halt BART Development
  • Union City Continues to Combat State over Redevelopment
  • Union City Sues State over Redevelopment Laws
  • A Moment of Relief—and Suspense—for Redevelopment
  • City Staff Positions At Risk in Redevelopment Dissolution
  • City Unveils New Station Center

-------

Like Union City Patch on Facebook | Follow Union City Patch on Twitter | Get Free Union City Patch Newsletters | Blog for Union City Patch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Union City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Edward May 17, 2013 at 05:05 pm
To add insult to injury, New Haven Unified just divided the community by re-naming a Middle SchoolRead More after two Phillipino labor leaders instead of an Early" Alto California", Mexican Governor after wich the Town of Alvarado was named. They created a WAR betwean comunities with flag waving and graphiti tagging damages even the police call a "Hate Crime". They should be naming a NEW High School after those two labor leaders and not just re-naming an existing historical Middle School. When push comes to shove, the New Haven Unified School Board will pay for a name change but not help pay for school supplies or keep good teachers with a good salery with benefits. They re-name a Middle School After labor leaders, but don't honor the Labor that had dedicated a lifetime to our children....Our Teachers.
Edward May 17, 2013 at 04:51 pm
Because new haven unified School District is so busy renaming or selling off Schools, they areRead More neglecting the 29.1 million dollar grant they got to help provide moderization and supplies to teachers. Instead of building a second High School, on the growing west side of union City, they sell off 15 acres and a relativly NEW, perfectly good school building just 3 blocks from a 70 year old Elementary School. When James Logan High School was Built, Union City had only 23,000 residents. Today, Union City bosts 77,000+ residents and has a single High School pushing 5000 students. Instead of building a new High School (like Fremont, that has 5 High School, one for each of ther original districts and a ROP School), New Haven Unified only has one in the Decoto District and Alvardo district residents must commute to the Decoto District to get an education beyond middle School. A 50 year old "busing policy" (without the Buses) in the name of diversity. Both sides of Highway 880 are just as diverse yet they will not build the west side a High School.
Edward May 17, 2013 at 05:16 pm
To add insult to injury, New Haven Unified just divided the community by re-naming a Middle SchoolRead More after two Phillipino labor leaders instead of an Early" Alto California", Mexican Governor after which the Town of Alvarado was named. They created a WAR betwean comunities with flag waving, fist shaking and graphiti tagging damages even the police call a "Hate Crime". They should be naming a NEW High School on the West Side of Union City after those two labor leaders and not just re-naming an existing historical Middle School. When push comes to shove, the New Haven Unified School Board will pay for a name change but not help pay for school supplies or keep good teachers with a good salery with benefits. They re-name a Middle School After labor leaders, but don't honor the Labor that had dedicated a lifetime to our children....Our Teachers.
Edward May 11, 2013 at 04:12 am
Here are some patch photos. you will notice the children marching with the" Filipino AdvocatesRead More for justice" banner all the way up to the New Haven Unified School District office. Do you think these photos could have incited the Vandels and selected their target? Violating the "Brown Act", the School Board created this problem by not putting the name change before the Voters before making this decision ahead of public comments and input. The outcome, of changing the name, and what the name would be, was already decided before they even put it on the agenda, behind closed doors. The clinched Fists, in the Top photo, did not help either. Remember, these are Patch Photos, that are public, and even more are out there in social media. http://storify.com/UnionCityPatch/a-collection-of-photos-and-reactions-to-alvarado-m/embed
Edward May 11, 2013 at 01:35 am
Dear Mr. Day: It is NOT the names of Larry itliong or Phlip Veracruz that have been at issue, itRead More has been the removal of an "existing" name, on an "existing" school, that already has Heritage Everyone agrees, that, if this was a new school, it would be good. We need a new High School on the west side of Union City because the existing School is pushing 5,000 students and is just to large and to far away. The School District is just playing politics with a "name" and not giving the Students what they realy need. They are selling off Real Estate with an existing School on the West Side, of Union City, to private developers, instead of giving us a new High School. People are fustrated with the School District and the Phillipino Comunity that pushed the name change and this is why they targetted the "Political Office" of the "Phillipino Community". This was not a random location...It was a "Shot Across the Bow". No amount of smooth talk or Guest Speakers will fix this. Only putting the name change "On the Ballot" will fix this. It must be resolved by everyone before we can "GO ON".
Edward May 14, 2013 at 04:00 pm
May 14,2013 Union City, California. Police said the first suspect pushed both homewoners down toRead More the floor and "forcefully removed the elderly female's jewelry." The second suspect found a young adult male locked in a bedroom, struck him in the head with the gun, ransacked the bedroom and took more property, police said. Both suspects fled on foot to a waiting vehicle, described as a newer model silver Audi sedan or BMW with chrome rims and tinted black windows. The vehicle was last seen being driven past Kitiyama Elementary School onto Medallion Drive, according to a Union City Police press release. Now this is about rich Black kids, with guns and driving BMWs, Attacking Elderly Whites in Union City. A little "political Vandelism" did not do this. This is a true "hate crime" against Whites yet it is reported as a "home invasion Robbery". They followed the Elderly White guy home from the store and pushed there way into the house and hurt everybody as they robbed them. Pre-selected an Elderly White Guy, because of hate" thencommited a crime against him and his family. The Political painting on a Political office was not a hate crime but a "political Statement". Get it Strait.
Edward May 11, 2013 at 04:00 am
Here are some patch photos. you will notice the children marching with the" Filipino AdvocatesRead More for justice" banner all the way up to the New Haven Unified School District office. Do you think these photos could have incited the Vandels and selected their target? Just a thought. http://storify.com/UnionCityPatch/a-collection-of-photos-and-reactions-to-alvarado-m/embed
Union City Resident May 9, 2013 at 09:44 pm
you could be on to a super idea! Online education. No ecological impacts. Everyone works at theirRead More own speed and capability. They get the best teacher every time because we can choose the lesson. Do anytime before midnight the same day if there is homework just like in college for those who sleep late and are always truant in regular school, no computer or too young and nobody at home, can go to computer centers. LOL You can name your own computer instead of school names. We can afford it better, cheaper for parents than school taxes, no administrators everywhere you look. Okay, I was just kidding...I think it's one issue at a time. School naming, school board, violating the Brown Act, address issues of recall, new elections, listening to the public, elected officials not following district policy, School Superintendent who knew or should have known it was a Brown Act violation, should be fired or not?, put issue on ballot by referendum or not?, let other elected officials write to editor instead of meeting with their voters?, Nobody trying to correct the errors made?, then discuss new high school. I agree with other letter - students being abused in school for maybe years now, bad test scores and they all say they know why but as educators they haven't fixed the problem yet, budget is non existent but we can afford all new band and athletic uniforms for the school with the new name LOL Taxpaying without representation