.
Feedback

Local Leaders Rally 'Round Redevelopment

Union City Mayor Mark Green joined politicians from around the East Bay at an Oakland rally to show their support for the state's embattled redevelopment agencies.

More than a dozen East Bay politicians and affordable housing advocates rallied in Downtown Oakland Wednesday to protest Gov. Jerry Brown's plan to shutter the state's redevelopment agencies. 

Protesters joined the pols in Henry J. Kaiser Memorial Park to condemn the governor's proposed cuts, saying the proposal would put more than 300,000 jobs at risk and kill $40 billion in economic activity statewide. 

“This proposal represents more of the same misguided and illegal state budget raids of local government funds that voters have repeatedly sought to end,” said Oakland Mayor Jean Quan. “It is penny-wise and pound-foolish to take away one of the state's most effective economic development tools.”

Quan gestured to the historic Fox Oakland Theatre and the 1,000  affordable housing units surrounding the square, the results of $67 million in redevelopment funds invested in the area which in turn spurred an additional $450 million in private investment.  

Union City Mayor Mark Green called Brown's budget “one of the worst proposals that has come out of Sacramento [in] 40 years.” (Click on the video to the right to hear Green's speech.)

He listed his redevelopment agency's , which included cleaning up a site contaminated with PCBs and replacing it with affordable housing.

Twenty percent of the property tax revenue used to fund redevelopment agencies is required by law to be spent on low-income housing.

“Thats a lot of money lost for affordable housing,” said Linda Mandolini, the Executive Director for Eden Housing, an affordable housing organization based in Alameda County.

The effects will probably be most intensely felt in unincorporated areas, “because they don't have any other resources aside from the state," Mandolini said.

Speaking for the Building Industry Association of the Bay Area, Executive Director Bob Glover pointed out that aside from hurting an already ailing construction industry thirsty for jobs, cutting redevelopment funds would make it “virtually impossible” to meet the state's with smart development.

However, lingering in the back of the conference and waiting for their chance in front of the cameras, two public figures from Contra Costa County held a different view.

Contra Costa County District 1 Supervisor John Gioia, along with Jim Bickert, president of the Deputy Sheriff's Association, attended the event to voice their support for Brown's proposal.

The money that goes to redevelopment agencies is property tax that is diverted from other local agencies like schools, police departments and firehouses. In light of the large deficit, the two argued that politicians have to reexamine their priorities and take care of core services first.

“Before we start building nicer buildings, we need to take care of some of government's core responsibilities,” Bickert said.    

The two were backed by an independent report released that day by the Legislative Analyst Office, which issues an annual assessment of the governor’s budget proposal intended to inform lawmakers before their vote.

According to the report, Brown's proposal would sure up $1.7 billion in the budget by offsetting state general fund costs for Medi-Cal and trial courts.

Redevelopment programs, the report found, divert revenue from local governments and increase state education costs, the programs have limited transparency and accountability and “no evidence” was found that redevelopment increases regional economic development.  

“Given the significant policy shortcomings of California’s redevelopment program, we agree with the Governor’s proposal to end it and to offer local governments alternative tools to finance economic development,” the report concluded.  

Mayor Quan said she was hopeful that legislators would side with she and her colleagues when it comes to a vote, but Union City Mayor Green seemed more discouraged, saying all he's gotten from lawmakers so far was sympathy.

It comes down to an age old political trade-off, Green said: Politicians want to know how much their support is worth to him and whether he'll give them his support on the next issue.

Green said his answer is: if this passes don't come to him for support for anything.

“Somewhere down the line there has to be some calling out of the cards on this one,” he said.

Though legislators have till the end of the spring to decide on the budget, Governor Brown is pushing for a decision by March.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Union City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Edward May 17, 2013 at 05:05 pm
To add insult to injury, New Haven Unified just divided the community by re-naming a Middle SchoolRead More after two Phillipino labor leaders instead of an Early" Alto California", Mexican Governor after wich the Town of Alvarado was named. They created a WAR betwean comunities with flag waving and graphiti tagging damages even the police call a "Hate Crime". They should be naming a NEW High School after those two labor leaders and not just re-naming an existing historical Middle School. When push comes to shove, the New Haven Unified School Board will pay for a name change but not help pay for school supplies or keep good teachers with a good salery with benefits. They re-name a Middle School After labor leaders, but don't honor the Labor that had dedicated a lifetime to our children....Our Teachers.
Edward May 17, 2013 at 04:51 pm
Because new haven unified School District is so busy renaming or selling off Schools, they areRead More neglecting the 29.1 million dollar grant they got to help provide moderization and supplies to teachers. Instead of building a second High School, on the growing west side of union City, they sell off 15 acres and a relativly NEW, perfectly good school building just 3 blocks from a 70 year old Elementary School. When James Logan High School was Built, Union City had only 23,000 residents. Today, Union City bosts 77,000+ residents and has a single High School pushing 5000 students. Instead of building a new High School (like Fremont, that has 5 High School, one for each of ther original districts and a ROP School), New Haven Unified only has one in the Decoto District and Alvardo district residents must commute to the Decoto District to get an education beyond middle School. A 50 year old "busing policy" (without the Buses) in the name of diversity. Both sides of Highway 880 are just as diverse yet they will not build the west side a High School.
Edward May 17, 2013 at 05:16 pm
To add insult to injury, New Haven Unified just divided the community by re-naming a Middle SchoolRead More after two Phillipino labor leaders instead of an Early" Alto California", Mexican Governor after which the Town of Alvarado was named. They created a WAR betwean comunities with flag waving, fist shaking and graphiti tagging damages even the police call a "Hate Crime". They should be naming a NEW High School on the West Side of Union City after those two labor leaders and not just re-naming an existing historical Middle School. When push comes to shove, the New Haven Unified School Board will pay for a name change but not help pay for school supplies or keep good teachers with a good salery with benefits. They re-name a Middle School After labor leaders, but don't honor the Labor that had dedicated a lifetime to our children....Our Teachers.
Edward May 11, 2013 at 04:12 am
Here are some patch photos. you will notice the children marching with the" Filipino AdvocatesRead More for justice" banner all the way up to the New Haven Unified School District office. Do you think these photos could have incited the Vandels and selected their target? Violating the "Brown Act", the School Board created this problem by not putting the name change before the Voters before making this decision ahead of public comments and input. The outcome, of changing the name, and what the name would be, was already decided before they even put it on the agenda, behind closed doors. The clinched Fists, in the Top photo, did not help either. Remember, these are Patch Photos, that are public, and even more are out there in social media. http://storify.com/UnionCityPatch/a-collection-of-photos-and-reactions-to-alvarado-m/embed
Edward May 11, 2013 at 01:35 am
Dear Mr. Day: It is NOT the names of Larry itliong or Phlip Veracruz that have been at issue, itRead More has been the removal of an "existing" name, on an "existing" school, that already has Heritage Everyone agrees, that, if this was a new school, it would be good. We need a new High School on the west side of Union City because the existing School is pushing 5,000 students and is just to large and to far away. The School District is just playing politics with a "name" and not giving the Students what they realy need. They are selling off Real Estate with an existing School on the West Side, of Union City, to private developers, instead of giving us a new High School. People are fustrated with the School District and the Phillipino Comunity that pushed the name change and this is why they targetted the "Political Office" of the "Phillipino Community". This was not a random location...It was a "Shot Across the Bow". No amount of smooth talk or Guest Speakers will fix this. Only putting the name change "On the Ballot" will fix this. It must be resolved by everyone before we can "GO ON".
Edward May 14, 2013 at 04:00 pm
May 14,2013 Union City, California. Police said the first suspect pushed both homewoners down toRead More the floor and "forcefully removed the elderly female's jewelry." The second suspect found a young adult male locked in a bedroom, struck him in the head with the gun, ransacked the bedroom and took more property, police said. Both suspects fled on foot to a waiting vehicle, described as a newer model silver Audi sedan or BMW with chrome rims and tinted black windows. The vehicle was last seen being driven past Kitiyama Elementary School onto Medallion Drive, according to a Union City Police press release. Now this is about rich Black kids, with guns and driving BMWs, Attacking Elderly Whites in Union City. A little "political Vandelism" did not do this. This is a true "hate crime" against Whites yet it is reported as a "home invasion Robbery". They followed the Elderly White guy home from the store and pushed there way into the house and hurt everybody as they robbed them. Pre-selected an Elderly White Guy, because of hate" thencommited a crime against him and his family. The Political painting on a Political office was not a hate crime but a "political Statement". Get it Strait.
Edward May 11, 2013 at 04:00 am
Here are some patch photos. you will notice the children marching with the" Filipino AdvocatesRead More for justice" banner all the way up to the New Haven Unified School District office. Do you think these photos could have incited the Vandels and selected their target? Just a thought. http://storify.com/UnionCityPatch/a-collection-of-photos-and-reactions-to-alvarado-m/embed
Union City Resident May 9, 2013 at 09:44 pm
you could be on to a super idea! Online education. No ecological impacts. Everyone works at theirRead More own speed and capability. They get the best teacher every time because we can choose the lesson. Do anytime before midnight the same day if there is homework just like in college for those who sleep late and are always truant in regular school, no computer or too young and nobody at home, can go to computer centers. LOL You can name your own computer instead of school names. We can afford it better, cheaper for parents than school taxes, no administrators everywhere you look. Okay, I was just kidding...I think it's one issue at a time. School naming, school board, violating the Brown Act, address issues of recall, new elections, listening to the public, elected officials not following district policy, School Superintendent who knew or should have known it was a Brown Act violation, should be fired or not?, put issue on ballot by referendum or not?, let other elected officials write to editor instead of meeting with their voters?, Nobody trying to correct the errors made?, then discuss new high school. I agree with other letter - students being abused in school for maybe years now, bad test scores and they all say they know why but as educators they haven't fixed the problem yet, budget is non existent but we can afford all new band and athletic uniforms for the school with the new name LOL Taxpaying without representation