Congressional Candidates Stark and Swalwell Square Off

Rep. Pete Stark has been in Congress for 40 years, but Dublin's first-term City Council member wants his tenure to end.

Of all the Democratic primary battles for congressional seats in the country, it's hard to imagine there are many contests between two candidates more different than the one in California's new 15th congressional district.

Rep. Pete Stark has been a mainstay in Washington for a generation. The 80-year-old liberal has served in Congress since 1973. Only four congressmen have been there longer. One can debate if Stark is as sharp intellectually as he's always been, but physically the years have clearly taken their toll. He battled pneumonia last year and walks with a limp.

His challenger is 31-year-old Alameda District Attorney Eric Swalwell. The  moderate is serving his first term on Dublin's City Council, his first elected position. He's a former Division I soccer player and looks like he would still have no problem playing 90 minutes on the pitch.

The district they are vying for is new, after the California Citizens Redistriciting Commission made drastic changes to the state's congressional map last year. Stark is currently representing the inner-East Bay, from Alameda down to Newark. But the open district comes into the Tri-Valley, starting in San Ramon, going east past Livermore, west to Castro Valley and down to Union City.

Their differences were on display Monday night, when Stark and Swalwell spoke to the Tri-Valley Democratic Club at IBEW Hall in Dublin. There was a straw poll taken after the two talked, that Swalwell won 32-19, taking advangtage of the home field advantage. But the takeaway from the night was this campaign isn't going to be too friendly.

Swalwell spoke first to the packed hall. He sounded like the attorney he is, laying out his arguments as if he was making an opening statement to a jury — and he went right after the aging congressman.

"Pete Stark has been a congressman for 40 years, I respect that," said Swalwell. Though, what he said next, showed he didn't respect Stark's time in office all that much.

"However, 40 years is a long time. And if you do not stay sharp, if you do not stay engaged, you can become out of step, out of touch and out of sight."

With Stark listening in the audience, Swalwell argued that his opponet was not fit to stay in office.

"Congressman Stark has become disconnected to our area and ineffective in representing our people," Swalwell said. "You see, Congressman Stark lives in the state of Maryland, and I'm not talking about along the Washington D.C.-Maryland border, he actually lives closer to the capital of Maryland than he does the to capital of the United States, where we sent him to serve."

The council member didn't stop there.

He went on to say how Stark's only connection to the area is an address where he does not live, so he can register to vote; he said Stark recently didn't allow media into a public town hall meeting; he called Stark "a part-time congressman" who misses more than 20 percent of the votes.

"I will work every day to bring new jobs and new opportunities to members of this district," Swalwell said.

After Swalwell spoke, Stark slowly made his way to the front of the room, casually taking a seat on the table.

While Swalwell came across as a bit stiff, even robotic at times, Stark looked more comfortable in front of the filled room. If being publicly berated by someone who was born nine years after he had started his tenure in congress bothered him, he didn't really show it.

Instead of firing back, Stark needled Swalwell.

While talking about his family and his roots to area, Stark said, "My son is a more senior, experienced assistant district attorney than the previous speaker."

Much of the audience chuckled.

Stark did defend his record, saying he's worked tirelessly over the last 40 years for the Democratic party and helped people less capable of helping themselves.

He said the votes he has missed were due to a battle with pneumonia last year, though Swalwell said after the forum that Stark was missing votes before his illness. When it comes to where he lives, Stark said he stays in Maryland to spend time with his school-aged children but comes to his district often and said after the meeting that he spends about a third of his time in the area.

While Swalwell argued that Stark being in office for so long is a weakness, Stark argued it's a strength.

"If you needed a heart transplant, would you look for someone right out of medical school who had never done a heart transplant before?" Stark said. "Or would you like someone who has done 100 heart transplants and you know how many patients lived? I think you know the answer to that."

During the Q&A portion, Stark was reminded that back in 1972, he was the young politician who knocked off the older incumbent, and was asked why it's different now.

Stark smiled, and said it wasn't so much his age, but his substantive differences with his opponent that won him the election.

When it comes to the issues, the substantive differences between Stark and Swalwell weren't on full-display Monday night. Swalwell is more moderate, but was subtle in his speech that he would be willing to work with Republicans.

"We're all in this together," Swalwell said. "But unless we get a Washington D.C. that starts working for us, and politicians that stop working against each other, the future of that dream will never be realized."

Swalwell faces a significant challenge to unseat Stark. The congressman has the full backing of the Democratic Party and the endorsement of almost every influential politician in the area.

But after Monday night, it's clear Swalwell won't go down without a fight.

Ron March 11, 2012 at 06:08 PM
BB, once again we see all you have to offer is the same old lame liberal propaganda (just keep repeating it over and over and over and over again...and one of these days even YOU may get tired of hearing this useless, negative, harmful, hateful, failure oriented trash). We're still waiting for you to show us where a liberal/socialist/Communist government has been successful anywhere in the WORLD! Show us please! Have you considered living in Cuba or North Korea? No "free speech" there which would stop your posts, but you'll get used to it. Do you think you could get used to having a central government tell you EVERYTHING to do? You'd be told where to live, how to travel, what to eat, how many children you may have, if you can own property, what job you'd be working, etc... Can you imagine that, you wouldn't have to do any thinking at all! Is "malarkey" your new big word for the day? "Irrational & factually dubious ranting" is straight from your Community Organizing & Disinformation Play Book. Please use some new words with some fresh ideas next time, OK? I'd like NOT to see what Obama acts like if he really liked American and Americans! Certainly you know the word "radical." Again, if you want to see a future Obama's America, just look at Greece, France, Cuba or North Korea. I really get a kick out of reading your disconnected posts BB. It is like batting practice :) More of the same old lame liberal chanting BB, it is just another day.
gato pelon March 16, 2012 at 03:39 PM
Observer, I don't see another way but to use a nom de plume on boards like this one. The very number of delusional irrational non thinkers posting here say's enough! I wouldn't want any of these pistol backing dido heads to know where I live. These were the very same people who were pissed off because they weren't aloud to carry bullets in their guns when they all met to eat fry chicken and drink coffee. Thankfully sanity prevailed in that regard!
Tim March 16, 2012 at 04:53 PM
No one carries "bullets" in their guns. We all carry ammunition.... and soon thanks to Democrat Senator Joe Manchin who just introduced HR 822 to the Senate, we'll be carrying loaded, concealed handguns legally here in CA.
Ron March 16, 2012 at 06:54 PM
"GP", hairless cats don't have anything to hide, but why do you? You should be thankful that there are others with different opinions so that just in case one of these days you finally see you're on a dead-end route, you'll be able to find your way back to reality. The rational, honest, sincere, faithful, concerned, loving, honorable and patriotic individuals will be more often found in our ranks than yours. The best example of this, is the Occupy flakes compared with the honest, law-abiding, peaceful, respectful and determined Tea Party folks. Now be honest "GP", have you seen any Tea Party (many are in agreement with this group although they may not be attending members) members spray painting buildings, breaking front business windows, starting fires, using illegal drugs, illegally stopping traffic, prohibiting private and government employees from going to their jobs (to earn money for their families), causing millions of dollars of additional and useless costs to cities and counties around the country, or anything like the anarchy we've seen on the news? Now if you are really honest "GP", you'll respond appropriately. Let's see what you do. Why do you only want the crooks to have guns? Personal gun ownership lowers crime. You want to be careful about the "projection personality" that liberals exhibit here. We know what you're about by what you irrationally accuse others of, again, another good old propgaganda tactic.
Tanya Rose April 12, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Hey everyone, there's a new story up today about this race: http://sanramon.patch.com/articles/stark-swalwell-pareja-congressional-debate-proves-feisty


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »